-
DRAWING, WRITING, ETC.:
–New Miscellany (2016-Present)
–Drawing Group (2015-Present)
–A slight so egregious it lingers beyond the dream (2015)
–The House without Orifices
(2014)
–Oversized Beneath the Percolator
(2014)
–Untitled/Unpictured (2013-2014)
–Excerpts (2007-2012)
–Bonfire Night (2012)
–Whispers Project (2011-2012)
–Paolo vs. “The Man” (2011-2012)
–Dicework II (2008-2009)
–The Dead (2008)
–Dicework I (2008)
–The Messier Catalogue (2007)
–Brushstroke Diagrams (2006-2007)
–Tell Me What to Paint (2006)
–Miscellaneous (2005-2006)ABOUT:
Lives and works in Vancouver, Canada. Primarily interested in the following: a) Visual and textual lines; b) the antiseptic tempered by a quiver of the handmade; and c) the diagrammatic and/or explanatory, especially when cloaked in ostensible self-importance without necessarily being true, serious business. Adherence to stringent procedural methods allows for an iterative exploration of the above concepts ad infinitum [read more].
–CV
–News
–Contact -
LINKS:
–andthefansroared
–Art for Life
–Art Waste
–bric-à-brac studio
–Christopher Sage
–Cody Rocko
–Copy
–Courtney Johnson
–The Dead 2
–Grand Union
–Hollingworth & Davie
–Jesse Gray
–John Russell
–Jordy Hamilton
–MAKE // BREAK // FIX
–Marina Roy
–Nice Things
–Nick Lakowski
–The Pleasant Matthews
–Tim Dixon
–VerySmallKitchen
–Whispers Project -
Site powered by WordPress.
WORK: optics
“Golden, early evening sunlight casts a reflection of the duvet upon the inside of the windowpane. Seen within this semitransparent mirror image is a sizeable shadow slowly, and silently, pacing to and fro across the surface of the duvet. But, no such shadow darkens the real, physical duvet. Certainly, nothing is moving, nor present, in the room (nor outside the window) to act as the source of the shadow. The only one there is the boy beneath the duvet.”
2012. Ink on paper. 7 x 7 in.
“He’s already been over it in his head. He’s figured it out. But he’s thinking about it again, compulsively. He’s wasting time. He’s thinking, not doing. And it is becoming less defined the more he reexamines it.”
2011. Ink on paper. 9 x 5.75 in.
“It’s sort of taken on a life of its own. Gregory is, in a sense, delighted they needn’t put any more work into it. Tadeusz is anxiously formulating how to stop it. Both are concerned that the result before them is not a logical conclusion but the work of some saboteur.”
2011. Ink on paper. 9 x 6 in.
“Now they’re just showing off, he thinks. ‘Tadeusz and Gregory.’ The mere sound of those two names makes the boy want to spit on the floor. It is perhaps only the presence of carpet beneath his feet that prevents him from doing so. This aversion has most likely been carried over from a former self (certain neuroses of hygiene accompanied several of his previous names); likewise, his current disdain for the pair of scientists is a reaction to specific events experienced by someone he will not reconcile as himself (despite corporeal continuity). These lingering compulsions would weaken the case for his practice of pronounced inconsistent identity if only he were to acknowledge their origins.”
2011. Ink on paper. 6 x 9 in.
“Tadeusz and Gregory are out celebrating. The experiment was a success. It worked like a charm. They’ve just raised their drinks together in congratulatory self-satisfaction. Liquid is in mouths, but a deflating pause confounds their expectant esophagi and betrays what has gently yet swiftly entered their thoughts only now: further possibilities and far deeper implications. Both men swallow slowly and deliberately in synchronised gestures of defeat. Tadeusz then taps the fingers of his left hand upon the table while glaring at the closed-captioned newscast on the flatscreen above the bar. Gregory loosens his tie, undoes the top button of his shirt, and silently stares into the depths of his beer.”
2011. Ink on paper. 6 x 9 in.
“Neither of them truly understands what went wrong. But they start over, turn the thing on its head, make a few intuitive adjustments, and before long it starts to resemble what they’d originally intended.”
2011. Ink on paper. 6 x 9 in.
“The problem wasn’t the equipment. They’ll have to rethink the experiment.”
2011. Ink on paper. 6 x 9 in.
“He is sacrificing persistent identity for the sake of being able to function in the here and now without the impediment of background determination. This is both what he is doing and why, both action and motivation.”
2011. Ink on paper. 6 x 9 in.
“And what of his differentiation between running with the present and running toward the future, are they actually two separable states?”
2011. Ink on paper. 6 x 9 in.
“Tadeusz is sitting on a stool with elbow propped on knee and brow resting in his palm. Gregory is rechecking the calibration of the instruments while trying to ignore the wreckage’s relentless assault upon his peripheral vision. These were not the expected results.”
2011. Ink on paper. 5.5 x 8.5 in.